Summary of 2005 Trip
This will be the final entry for this years PilgrimPaul’s blog. I would like to summarize my experiences and my impressions of the zoos I have seen and what makes the best exhibits from the perspective of a visitor. In my opinion the best exhibits are wider than deep which allows for better viewing angles of the animals by the visitors. Generally with exhibits configured in the manner I suggested there can be more viewing areas at varying levels of elevation. Exhibits where glass is an integral part of the design the visitors experience closer contact with the animals through the glass. A very special experience is afforded the visitors when the animals choose to involve themselves with the visitors through the glass. Obviously I do not have the knowledge to determine whether this type of exhibit configuration will have an adverse effect on the wellbeing of the animals. To my untrained eye some animals appeared to enjoy this contact. If the animals did not have an interest in said contact they went about their business without an apparent interest in the windows or the visitors on the other side. Exhibits that allow for wider and less deep areas do not lose exhibit space because the back half of the space is allocated to another species. The most interesting exhibits are the ones in which multi species of animals are exhibited together. The outdoor exhibits which allow for elevated viewing do not appear to affect the animals because they do not look to the visitors as they move about their exhibits. Including an underground poolside viewing area to a land exhibit offers the visitor an opportunity to view a land based animal’s swimming technique.